Admissibility of WhatsApp Chats in a Court of Law

Sammed AkiwateLaw

Admissibility of WhatsApp Chats in a Court of Law

Technology has become an integral part of our daily lives. Over the years, we have seen how internet-based services are being used in committing a crime. On the premises that WhatsApp has become a verb, I will be discussing the … Read More

Akhil Kumar Agarwal v. State of Uttarakhand

Srushti IyerCase Summary

Admissibility of mobiles and CDRs without Section 65B certificate

Akhil Kumar Agarwal v. State of Uttarakhand In the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital Cr A 77, 83, 157/2017 Before Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Alok Kumar Verma Decided on September 02, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of … Read More

Runeet Gulathi v. State

Srushti IyerCase Summary

Requiring the Section 65B certificate for CDRs in nexus with the crime

Runeet Gulathi v. State 2019 (4) Crimes 285 (Del.) In the High Court of Delhi Crl A 1175/2018, Crl M (Bail) 1815/2018, Crl M (Bail) 1997/2018, 536/2019, Crl A 27/2019, 60/2019, Crl M (Bail) 107/2019 Before Justice Manmohan and Justice … Read More

Jisal Rasak v. The State of Kerala

Srushti IyerCase Summary

Whether the accused can receive a digital copy of electronic evidence?

Jisal Rasak Vs. The State of Kerala 2019 (4) KHC 928 In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Crl MC 4148/2019(G) Before Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V. Decided on September 30, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Whether the accused can … Read More

State v. Mohd. Afzal

Titiksha SethCase Summary

State v. Mohd. Afzal

State v. Mohd. Afzal In the High Court of Delhi Crl App 80/2003 Before Justice Usha Mehra and Justice Pradeep Nandrajog Decided on October 29, 2003 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of electronic evidence u/s 65A and 65B of the … Read More

Abhinav Gupta v. JCB India Limited & Ors

Sahana ChaudhuriCase Summary

Abhinav Gupta v. JCB India Limited & Ors

Abhinav Gupta v. JCB India Limited and Ors In the High Court of Delhi FAO(OS) 488/2008, 489/2008 Before Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Valmiki J. Mehta Decided on September 1, 2010 Relevancy of the case:  The intervention of the … Read More