Akhil Kumar Agarwal v. State of Uttarakhand

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Akhil Kumar Agarwal v. State of Uttarakhand MANU/UC/0661/2019 In the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital Cr A 77, 83, 157/2017 Before Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Alok Kumar Verma Decided on September 02, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of mobile devices and CDRs without fulfilling the requirements under Section 65B Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, … Read More

Runeet Gulathi v. State

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Runeet Gulathi v. State 2019 (4) Crimes 285 (Del.) In the High Court of Delhi Crl A 1175/2018, Crl M (Bail) 1815/2018, Crl M (Bail) 1997/2018, 536/2019, Crl A 27/2019, 60/2019, Crl M (Bail) 107/2019 Before Justice Manmohan and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal Decided on September 20, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Satisfaction of requirements under Section 65B when CDRs … Read More

Jisal Rasak v. The State of Kerala

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Jisal Rasak Vs. The State of Kerala 2019 (4) KHC 928 In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Crl MC 4148/2019(G) Before Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V. Decided on September 30, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Whether a copy of CCTV footage should be provided to the accused? Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 2(t), Section-4) … Read More

Swami Ramdev and Ors v. Facebook Inc and Ors

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Swami Ramdev & Ors v. Facebook & Ors. 263 (2019) DLT 689 In the High Court of Delhi CS (OS) 27/2019 Before Justice Pratibha M. Singh Decided on October 23, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Global removal of defamatory content Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 79) Relevant Facts of the Case The allegation of the … Read More

Mamata Bhowmik v. Union of India

Anshika DhawanCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Mamata Bhowmik v. Union of India 2019 6 GLR 219 In the High Court of Guwahati WP(C) No 8610/2018 Before  Justice AMB Barus and Justice A. Borthakur Decided on February 19, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Requirements under Section 65B(4) for admitting a digitally signed copy of the voter’s list Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section … Read More

Royal Bank of Scotland v. DCIT

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Royal Bank of Scotland v. DCIT In the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata I.T.A. No 1738/Kol/2009, 1926/Kol/2010 & 519/Kol/2011 Before Mr Mahavir Singh, Judicial Member and Mr M. Balaganesh, Administrative Member Relevancy of the case: Whether an ATM falls under the definition of a computer? Statutes & Provisions Involved Income Tax Act, 1961 (Section 32(1)) The Information Technology … Read More

Pootholi Damodaran Nair v. Babu

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Pootholi Damodaran Nair v. Babu (2006) 3 CCR 383 In the High Court of Kerala WP(C) No. 35871/2003 Before Justice K. R. Udaybhanu Decided on March 30, 2005 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of a tape record. Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 2(1)(t), 2(1)(o)) The Evidence Act, 1872 (Section 63, 65A, 65B) Relevant Facts of … Read More

State of Maharashtra v. Ramesh Vishwanath Darandale & Ors

Srushti IyerCase SummaryLeave a Comment

State of Maharashtra v. Ramesh Vishwanath Darandale & Ors In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Criminal Appeal No. 949/2018 Before Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari and Justice Sandeep K. Shinde Decided on September 02, 2019  Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of CDRs and certificate requirements under Section 65B Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 2(1)(t)) The … Read More

Mohinder Singh v. Baljit Singh & Ors

Raj PagariyaCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Mohinder Singh v. Baljit Singh & Ors (2014) 4 ICC 145 In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana CR No 1350/2012 (O&M) Before Justice (Dr) Bharat Bhushan Parsoon Decided on August 04, 2014 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of digital evidence Statutes & Provisions Involved The Information Technology Act, 2000 The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Section 3A, 17, 22, … Read More

Sudarshan Cargo Pvt. Ltd. v. Techvac Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Raj PagariyaCase SummaryLeave a Comment

Sudarshan Cargo Pvt. Ltd. v. Techvac Engineering Pvt. Ltd. 2013 (4) AKR 654 In the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore COP Number 11/2013 Before Justice Aravind Kumar Decided on June 25, 2013 Relevancy of the case: Whether emails acknowledging the debt would constitute a valid and legal acknowledgement of debt, though not signed as required u/s 18 of the … Read More