Sabu Mathew George v. Union of India (February 2017)

The Cyber Blog IndiaCase Summary

Directions for blocking advertisements related to sex determination on search engines and websites

Sabu Mathew George v. Union of India
In the Supreme Court of India
W.P.(C) 341/2008
Before Justice Dipak Misra and Justice R. Bhanumati
Decided on February 16, 2017

Relevancy of the case: Directions for blocking advertisements related to sex determination on search engines and websites

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 69A)
  • The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (Section 22)
  • The Constitution of India, 1950 (Article 19(1)(a), 32)

Relevant Facts of the Case

  • The petitioner filed a writ in 2008 regarding the lacklustre approach of the respondents in stopping the advertisements on their search engines.
  • The petitioner suggested prohibiting and auto-blocking advertisements related to sex selection, pre-natal or pre-conception child sex and subsequently for abortion.

Prominent Arguments by the Advocates

  • The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the respondents’ measures were inadequate. The counsel pointed out from an affidavit that some agencies are still publishing such advertisements.
  • The respondents’ counsel submitted they would implement the auto-block feature. However, such advertisements must be brought to their notice.
  • The Union of India filed an affidavit for submitting the details of setting up a Nodal Agency to receive complaints on the violation of Section 22 of the PCPNDT Act, 1994.

Opinion of the Bench

  • The doctrine of auto-block must be applied within a reasonable time. The court found it difficult to accept the submission that respondents could only do the needful if brought to their notice. It has to be an in-house procedure.

Final Decision

  • The search engines shall appoint an in-house expert body. This body shall ensure their search results comply with Section 22 of the PCPNDT Act, 1994.
  • The court directed the matter to be listed on April 11, 2017 for further hearing.

Tuba Aftab, an undergraduate student at IIMT & School of Law, GGSIPU, prepared this case summary during her internship with The Cyber Blog India in May/June 2021.