Trade Wings Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 3 Mah LJ 407 In the High Court of Bombay Cri. W.P. 2146, 2456/2009 Before Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice U D Salvi Decided on September 20, 2010 Relevancy of the … Read More
Nirmaljit Singh Narula v. Yashwant Singh (2012) 132 DRJ 370 In the High Court of Delhi IA 10017/2012 in CS(OS) 1518/2012 Before Justice Kailash Gambhir Decided on September 14, 2012 Relevancy of the case: Injunction against the defendants for publishing … Read More
I. Linga Bhaskar v. State In the High Court of Madras Crl. O.P. (M.D.) 3110/2017 Before Justice S.S. Sundar Decided on June 05, 2018 Relevancy of the case: Whether sending an emoji (smiling face with tears) in a WhatsApp group … Read More
Sarikh Ali (Sharikh) v. State of Madhya Pradesh In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Misc. Crl. Case 9142/2020 Before Justice S.K. Awasthi Decided on March 02, 2020 Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving transmission of … Read More
Divya v. Inspector of Police & Anr. In the High Court of Madras Crl.O.P. (MD). 10701/2017 & Crl.M.P. (MD). 7337/2017 Before Justice N Anand Venkatesh Decided on November 20, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Quashing of FIR involving cyber terrorism … Read More
Yogesh Agarwal v. State of Karnataka (2020) 8 Kant LJ 327 In the High Court of Karnataka C.P. 3197/2020 Before Justice B A Patil Decided on September 24, 2020 Relevancy of the case: Petition for quashing of FIR in a … Read More
Sahil v. State of Maharashtra (2021) 2 Bom CR (Cri) 247 In the High Court of Bombay Crl. A. 715/2020 Before Justice V M Deshpande and Justice Anil S Kilor Decided on November 03, 2020 Relevancy of the case: Quashing … Read More
Avinash Tripathy v. State of Odisha In the High Court of Orissa BLAPL 1065/2019 Before Justice S. K. Sahoo Decided on March 14, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving capturing and morphing of indecent pictures … Read More
Madanjit Kumar v. J P Singh In the High Court of Delhi Crl. M.C. 76/2018 Before Justice R K Gauba Decided on January 23, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Defamation suit for initiating disciplinary proceedings based on involvement in pornography … Read More