Kritika Pandey v. State of Uttarakhand In the High Court of Uttarakhand W.P. Crl. 2242/2020, CLMA 4742/2020 Before Justice R.C. Khulbe Decided on January 4, 2021 Relevancy of the case: Writ petition under Article 226 for quashing of proceedings after … Read More
Khaja Azhar Uddin v. Union of India In the High Court of Telangana WP 10507/2020 Before Justice A Rajasheker Reddy Decided on July 20, 2020 Relevancy of the case: Writ petition against the ban on TikTok app Statutes and Provisions … Read More
Jagisha Arora v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) 6 SCC 619 In the Supreme Court of India W.P.(Crl.) 164/2019 Before Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Ajay Rastogi Decided on June 11, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Writ petition under Article … Read More
Nimmagadda Saroja v. State of Telangana In the High Court of Telangana W.P. 8383/2020 Before Justice T. Vinod Kumar Decided on June 18, 2020 Relevancy of the case: Writ of mandamus to declare inactivity of the respondent authority for delay … Read More
State of Maharashtra v. Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee (2018) 9 SCC 745 In the Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal 1124/2018 Before Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud Decided on September 05, 2018 Relevancy of … Read More
![[Redacted] v. State of West Bengal](https://cyberblogindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Redacted-v.-State-of-West-Bengal-865x433.png)
[Redacted] v. State of West Bengal In the High Court of Calcutta Writ Petition 5031(W)/2017 Before Justice Joymalya Bagchi Decided on August 7, 2017 Relevancy of the case: Writ petition in a case involving harassment and sending of obscene emails … Read More
KR Ravi Rathinam v. Kamarajar Salai & Ors In the Madras High Court at Madurai W.P.(MD) 18210/2014 and M.P.(MD) 1-2/2014 Before Justice M. Venugopal Decided on December 03, 2014 Relevancy of the case: Filing writ petition for … Read More
Pootholi Damodaran Nair v. Babu (2006) 3 CCR 383 In the High Court of Kerala WP(C) No. 35871/2003 Before Justice K. R. Udayabhanu Decided on March 30, 2005 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of a tape record in the Court. … Read More