Sarath v. State of Kerala In the High Court of Kerala B.A. 9028/2021 Before Justice Gopinath P. Decided on December 21, 2021 Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving rape on the false pretext of marriage and … Read More
Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India & Ors (2011) 5 SCC 1 In the Supreme Court W.P. (C) 51/2006 Before Justice Dr Dalveer Bhandari and Justice A.K. Patnaik Decided on April 18, 2011 Relevancy of the case: A public interest … Read More
Maqbool Fida Husain v. Rajkumar Pandey 2008 Cri LJ 4107 : (2008) 2 CCR 392 In the High Court of Delhi Cri. R.P. 114, 280, 282/2007 Before Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Decided on May 08, 2008 Relevancy of the case: Whether … Read More
Avnish Bajaj v. State (NCT) of Delhi 116 (2005) DLT 427 In the High Court of Delhi B.A. 2284/2004 Before Justice Vikramajit Sen Decided on December 21, 2004 Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving the publication … Read More
Ravari Kirankumar v. Home Department In the High Court of Bombay Crl. App. (Apl) 771/ 2020 Before Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala Decided on November 18, 2021 Relevancy of the case: Quashing of FIR in a case … Read More
Lala v. State of Chhattisgarh (2021) 2 CGLJ 201 In the High Court of Chhattisgarh Cr.M.P. 65/2015 Before Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Decided on January 4, 2021 Relevancy of the case: Quashing of orders issuing a non-bailable warrant after a … Read More
Harish Kumar v. State of Punjab In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana CRM-M 39639/2020 Before Justice Hari Pal Verma Decided on December 04, 2020 Relevancy of the Case: Proving close relationship between the complainant and the accused using … Read More
Today, we live in a world where even a kindergarten child needs a mobile phone to study. Thanks to the pandemic, we all have become slaves of technology. Is it even possible to imagine our lives without our mobile phone, … Read More
Kaliswari v. Secretary to Government In the High Court of Madras H.C.P. 1973/2015 Before Justice S. Nagamuthu and Justice M. Sathyanarayanan Decided on March 21, 2016 Relevancy of the case: Habeas corpus petition in a case involving obscene comments and … Read More