Jeevan v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 4 Bom CR (Cri) 682 In the High Court of Bombay Crl. W.P. 731/2013 Before Justice Abhay M. Thipsay Decided on September 30, 2013 Relevancy of the case: Petition to quash FIR in a … Read More
Rathnavath Dharmendar v. Rathnavath Gopal In the High Court of Telangana Criminal Petition 6399/2021 Before Justice K. Surender Decided on January 24, 2023 Relevancy of the case: Petition to quash proceedings in a case registered by the father against his … Read More
TVF Media Labs Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2023) 1 HCC (Del) 778 In the High Court of Delhi Crl. M.C. 2214/2020 and Crl. M.A. 15761/2020 Before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma Decided on March 06, 2023 Relevancy of … Read More
Jameel Ahmd v. State of Chhattisgarh In the High Court of Chhattisgarh CRA 1165/2002 Before Justice D.K. Tiwari Decided on August 12, 2022 Relevancy of the Case: Validity of conviction under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for owning cassettes containing … Read More
Maqbool Fida Husain v. Rajkumar Pandey 2008 Cri LJ 4107 : (2008) 2 CCR 392 In the High Court of Delhi Cri. R.P. 114, 280, 282/2007 Before Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Decided on May 08, 2008 Relevancy of the case: Whether … Read More
Avnish Bajaj v. State (NCT) of Delhi 116 (2005) DLT 427 In the High Court of Delhi B.A. 2284/2004 Before Justice Vikramajit Sen Decided on December 21, 2004 Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving the publication … Read More
Harish Kumar v. State of Punjab In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana CRM-M 39639/2020 Before Justice Hari Pal Verma Decided on December 04, 2020 Relevancy of the Case: Proving close relationship between the complainant and the accused using … Read More
The notion behind privacy is that a person should have the right to claim sovereignty over oneself. The idea for this is that the inherent value of an individual allows them to exercise privacy. Thus, such a claim must be … Read More
Sasikala Pushpa v. Facebook India & Ors. In the High Court of Delhi CS(OS) 510/2016 Before Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw Decided on June 02, 2020 Relevancy of the Case: Liability of an intermediary under Section 79 Statutes and Provisions Involved The … Read More