State of Orissa v. Narayan Chandra Nayak (2013) 121 AIC 431 In the High Court of Orissa Cr. M.C. No. 3812 of 2011 Before Justice B.K. Nayak Decided on August 01, 2012 Relevancy of the case: Using audio-video cassettes containing … Read More
State of Maharashtra v. Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap 2019 ALLMR (Cri) 2889 In the High Court of Bombay Death Sentence Ref. 3/2015 and Crl. A No. 1111/2015 Before Justice Ranjit V. More and Justice Bharati H. Dangre Decided on December 20, … Read More
Gulshan v. State (2019) 257 DLT 296 (DB) In the High Court of Delhi Crl.A. 834/2016 Before Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal Decided on January 17, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Requirement of Section 65B Certificate in … Read More
Havovi Kersi Sethna v. Kersi Gustad Sethna (2011) 3 Mah LJ 564 In the High Court of Bombay Notice of Motion No. 8 of 2010 in Suit No. 16 of 2008 Before Justice Smt. Roshan Dalvi Decided on January 28, … Read More
S. Karunakaran v. Srileka In the Madras High Court CMP 10093/2019 Before Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice N. Sathish Kumar Decided on April 30, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Presumption as to the sender of … Read More
K. Ramajayam v. Inspector of Police Referred Trial 1/2015, Cr A 110/2015 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Before Justice R. Sudhakar and Justice P. N. Prakash Decided January 27, 2016 Relevancy of the case: Certificate requirements for … Read More
Runeet Gulathi v. State 2019 (4) Crimes 285 (Del.) In the High Court of Delhi Crl A 1175/2018, Crl M (Bail) 1815/2018, Crl M (Bail) 1997/2018, 536/2019, Crl A 27/2019, 60/2019, Crl M (Bail) 107/2019 Before Justice Manmohan and Justice … Read More
Jisal Rasak Vs. The State of Kerala 2019 (4) KHC 928 In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Crl MC 4148/2019(G) Before Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V. Decided on September 30, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Whether the accused can … Read More
Pootholi Damodaran Nair v. Babu (2006) 3 CCR 383 In the High Court of Kerala WP(C) No. 35871/2003 Before Justice K. R. Udayabhanu Decided on March 30, 2005 Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of a tape record in the Court. … Read More