Lucknow Development Authority v. Anupama Singh

Samiksha UniyalCase Summary

Reliance on electronic modes for sending orders, directions, or decisions of the Tribunal

Lucknow Development Authority v. Anupama Singh
In the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal
Appeal (D) 480-481/2020
Before Justice D.K. Arora, Chairman, Mr T.B. Singh (Judicial Member), and Mr Rajiv Misra (Administrative Member)
Decided on June 11, 2021

Relevancy of the Case: Reliance on electronic modes for sending orders, directions, or decisions of the Tribunal

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 2(1))
  • The Constitution of India, 1950 (Article 14)
  • The Limitation Act, 1963 (Section 4, 5, 9)
  • The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (Section 2, 44)

Relevant Facts of the Case

  • The appellant intends to file an appeal against the order passed by the adjudicating officer. However, The limitation period of sixty days has expired.
  • The appellant has requested the condonation of delay caused due to lockdown during COVID-19, transfer of clerk, change of lawyer and Holi vacation.

Opinion of the Bench

  • The limitation period starts from the date of receipt of the order. Electronic media such as SMS, WhatsApp, E-mail and e-portal of court or tribunal are the acceptable ways to send any order, direction or decision passed by the authority.
  • One can file an online appeal on non-working days. Such days are not considered holidays for counting the limitation period.
  • The tribunal did not find the reasons for the delay satisfactory. There is no sufficient ground to admit the appeal beyond the limitation period.

Final Decision

  • As a result, the tribunal dismissed the appeal.