Ketan Kantilal Modi v. Central Board of Excise & Customs

Gitanjali SadanCase Summary

Transferring an RTI application to a subordinate office of the public authority through email

Ketan Kantilal Modi v. Central Board of Excise & Customs
[2009] CIC 11455

In the Central Information Commission
Appeal CIC/AT/A/2008/01280
Before Mr Wajahat Habibullah, Chief Information Commissioner
Decided on September 22, 2009

Relevancy of the case: Transferring an RTI application to a subordinate office of the public authority through email

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 4)
  • The Right to Information Act, 2005 (Section 6(1) and 6(3))

Relevant Facts of the Case

  • The appellant filed an RTI application inquiring about a corruption case among licensed Bulk Mail Handlers/Outsourcing Agents to provide bulk mail handling service to their respective clients.
  • However, he did not receive any response. Hence, he appellant filed his second appeal before the Information Commissioner.
  • The Commissioner directed the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) to provide the appellant with email IDs of the CPIOs of all public authorities as they have the requested information.
  • Moreover, the Commissioner stated that a larger bench should decide the scope of transferring petitions to an appropriate authority under Section 6(1) and 6(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Prominent Arguments by the Advocates

  • The appellant requested the Commission to give detailed attention to Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 because it gives legal recognition to electronic records.
  • Further, he contended that the Commissioner made an error in the judgment by not referring to this provision while giving the decision.

Opinion of the Bench

  • The CPIO of the public authority can instantly and inexpensively transfer the application under Section 6(1) to its subordinate offices. This process simply involves sending an email.
  • Therefore, CBEC should transfer the appellant’s RTI application electronically to the subordinate offices.
  • In addition, the appellant cannot use words like malafide intention of CPIO or the Commissioner for taking a reasonable stand as per the RTI Act.

Final Decision

  • The bench disposed of this matter. Also, they passed directions to transfer the RTI application to subordinate offices via email.