Divyan Vivekanandan v. State of Karnataka In the High Court of Karnataka Criminal Petition 6797/2017 Before Justice Sreenivas Harish Kumar Decided on September 28, 2017 Relevancy of the case: Bail application for offences under Section 66C and 66D of the … Read More
Manjunath S. v. State of Karnataka In the High Court of Karnataka Cri. P. 8139/2019 Before Justice B.A. Patil Decided on January 3, 2020 Relevancy of the case: Quashing of proceedings for an offence under Section 66 of the Information … Read More
Mahesh Prasad Kamble v. State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay Cr. App. 186/2016 Before Justice Ranjit More and Justice V.L. Achliya Decided on February 23, 2016 Relevancy of the case: Quashing of criminal proceedings for an offence … Read More
Sugananthan v. C.B.C.I.D. In the High Court of Madras Crl. O.P. 15336/2015 Before Justice P.N. Prakash Decided on September 23, 2015 Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving withdrawals through fake ATM cards Statutes and Provisions Involved … Read More
Jayaram v. State of Karnataka In the High Court of Karnataka Criminal Petition 4731/2015 Before Justice L. Narayana Swamy Decided on August 4, 2015 Relevancy of the case: Bail application for offences under Sections 66C & 66D of the Information … Read More
Fr. Jaison Kollannur v. State of Kerala In the High Court of Kerala B.A. 14-15/2013 Before Justice P. Bhavadasan Decided on January 11, 2013 Relevancy of the case: Bail in a case involving Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, … Read More
Being a student who is currently pursuing an integrated degree in computer science and cyber law, I was very curious when I read an article in a Marathi newspaper in the last week of May. This article was printed on … Read More
I.T.C. Ltd. and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Anr. (2008) 62 ACC 875 In the High Court of Allahabad Cr. Misc. Application No. 12986 of 2006 Before Justice Amar Saran Decided on July 9, 2008 Relevancy of the case: … Read More
On January 04, 2019, the RBI notified a new circular dealing[1] with limiting the liability of customers in unauthorized electronic payment transactions in PPIs (Prepaid Payment Instruments) issued by authorized non-banks. This is the third circular notified by the Reserve … Read More