Image
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Workshops
  • About
    • About Us
    • Objectives
    • Our Achievements
    • My Cyber Crime Story
    • Team

Technology. Law. Policy. You

For all things cyber

Jai Singh Sisodiya v. Central Bureau of Investigation

The Cyber Blog IndiaFebruary 17, 2021Case Summary

Jai Singh Sisodiya v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Jai Singh Sisodiya v. Central Bureau of Investigation
In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
M.C.R.C. 17117/2016
Before Justice S. K. Gangele
Decided on October 03, 2016

Relevancy of the case: Bail application in a case involving the withdrawal of money received illegally in the bank account

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 66C)
  • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Sections 120B, 109, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A)
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1968 (Section 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d), 13(2))
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 439)

Relevant Facts of the Case

  • It was alleged that an amount of ₹ 6,60,000/- was deposited in the applicant’s bank account illegally, and he had withdrawn it.
  • It was stated that another co-accused, Mr Raghuwanshi, had withdrawn an amount of ₹6,95,000/- that was deposited in his account illegally. The CBI did not arrest the applicant during the investigation, but he was arrested after the charge sheet was filed. The trial court had granted bail without looking into the merits of the matter, upon a personal bond of ₹50,000/- along with one solvent surety.

Prominent Arguments by Advocates

  • The applicant’s counsel submitted that the manager had already deposited the amount, and Rajaram Raghuwanshi, the co-accused, had already been granted bail by this court.

Final Decision

  • Application allowed.
  • Bail granted, subject to conditions.

This case summary has been prepared by Shrawani Mohani, an undergraduate student at ILS Law College, Pune, during her internship with The Cyber Blog India in January/February 2021.

Tags:bail application, bank account, bank fraud, financial fraud, illegal, illegal deposit, money deposit, Section 66C IT Act 2000, shrawani-mohani, withdrawal of money

Our recent posts

  • Rule 14: The Digital Iron Curtain on Cross-Border Data Transfers
  • AI and the Grey Areas of Indian Copyright Law
  • When what appears to be Cyber Squatting is not exactly Cyber Squatting
  • Analysing Smart Contracts on the Contours of Conventional Elements of a Contract
  • Runway Rewired: The Tech-Twist Revolution

Reach out to us for assistance!

Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +91 9340337396

In case of an offence against a woman/girl, for the sake of comfort, the victim/survivor may put forth a special request to get in touch with a female team member to assist her.

Guest Post Guidelines are available here. 

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Workshops
  • About
    • About Us
    • Objectives
    • Our Achievements
    • My Cyber Crime Story
    • Team