Image
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Workshops
  • About
    • About Us
    • Objectives
    • Our Achievements
    • My Cyber Crime Story
    • Team

Technology. Law. Policy. You

For all things cyber

Yash Vamya v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Harmannat KourMay 27, 2024Case Summary

Quashing of FIR and court proceedings in a case involving creating a fake account after the settlement between the parties

Yash Vamya v. State of Madhya Pradesh
In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
MCRC 45261/2023
Before Justice Subodh Abhyankar
Decided on January 25, 2024

Relevancy of the case: Quashing of FIR and court proceedings in a case involving creating a fake account after the settlement between the parties

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 66C, 66D)
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 482, 320(2))

Relevant Facts of the Case

  • The petitioner obtained a chemical engineering degree and had a bright future. He made a fake ID of the complainant and posted some pictures.
  • Due to the case, serious prejudice would be caused to the petition’s future.
  • The complainant has agreed to compromise the matter. The petitioner has filed this application under Section 320(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to compound the matter.

Prominent Arguments by the Advocates

  • The petitioner’s counsel argued that the only allegation was that he used the complainant’s fake ID. None of the photographs were obscene in any manner. The court should quash the FIR since the parties have already settled.

Opinion of the Bench

  • The court noted the complainant’s lack of support for the prosecution. The nature of the offence is minor, with no harm to the complainant.
  • The court also considered the petitioner’s young age and the effect on his future.

Final Decision

  • The court quashed the FIR and the resultant court proceedings.

Tags:complainant, compounding, compromise, court proceedings, cyber cell Ujjain, fake account, fake ID, FIR, harmannat-kour, Madhya Pradesh HC, prosecution, quashing, Section 66C, Section 66D, settlement

Our recent posts

  • Rule 14: The Digital Iron Curtain on Cross-Border Data Transfers
  • AI and the Grey Areas of Indian Copyright Law
  • When what appears to be Cyber Squatting is not exactly Cyber Squatting
  • Analysing Smart Contracts on the Contours of Conventional Elements of a Contract
  • Runway Rewired: The Tech-Twist Revolution

Reach out to us for assistance!

Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +91 9340337396

In case of an offence against a woman/girl, for the sake of comfort, the victim/survivor may put forth a special request to get in touch with a female team member to assist her.

Guest Post Guidelines are available here. 

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Workshops
  • About
    • About Us
    • Objectives
    • Our Achievements
    • My Cyber Crime Story
    • Team