NCS Sugars Limited v. P.E.C. Limited

TannviCase Summary

"Executed" and "execution" in the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 includes attribution of electronic records as per Section 11 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

NCS Sugars Limited v. P.E.C. Limited In the High Court of Delhi OMP (Comm) 18/2020 and IA 456-457/2020 Before Justice Vibhu Bakhru Decided on October 22, 2021 Relevancy of the Case: “Executed” and “execution” in the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 … Read More

Reliance Retail Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand

Gitanjali SadanCase Summary

Pari materia provisions to Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

Reliance Retail Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand In the High Court of Jharkhand WP(C) 4285/2014 Before Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary Decided on August 29, 2018 Relevancy of the Case: Pari materia provisions to Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 Statutes … Read More

Vijay Kumar Dange v. Saroj Thakur

Samiksha UniyalCase Summary

Interpretation of Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

Vijay Kumar Dange v. Saroj Thakur & Anr. In the High Court of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MMO 171/2015 Before Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan Decided on July 31, 2015 Relevancy of the case: Interpretation of Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, … Read More

Raj Pal Kapil v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Samiksha UniyalCase Summary

Interpretation of Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

Raj Pal Kapil v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr (2014) 133 AIC 671 In the High Court of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MMO 75/2013 Before Justice Surinder Singh Decided on July 17, 2013 Relevancy of the case: Interpretation of Section 85 … Read More

Anuradha Raman v. Ministry of Home Affairs

Samiksha UniyalCase Summary

Blocking the public access to information under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000

Anuradha Raman v. Ministry of Home Affairs [2013] CIC 7087 In the Central Information Commission Case CIC/SS/A/12/001643 Before Mrs Sushma Singh, Information Commissioner Decided on April 15, 2013 Relevancy of the case: Blocking the public access to information under Section … Read More

Arshay Aazam v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Samiksha UniyalCase Summary

Bail application in a VYAPAM scam case

Arshay Aazam v. State of Madhya Pradesh In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh M.Cr.C. 2234/2015 Before Chief Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice R.S. Jha Decided on February 26, 2015 Relevancy of the Case: Bail application in a VYAPAM scam … Read More

M.P. Basheer v. State of Kerala

Gitanjali SadanCase Summary

Quashing proceedings under Section 66A and Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

M. P. Basheer v. State of Kerala In the High Court of Kerala Crl. MC. 6793/2019 (H) Before Justice R. Narayana Pisharadi Decided on October 11, 2019 Relevancy of the case: Quashing proceedings under Section 66A and Section 85 of … Read More