Arshay Aazam v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Samiksha UniyalCase Summary

Bail application in a VYAPAM scam case

Arshay Aazam v. State of Madhya Pradesh
In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
M.Cr.C. 2234/2015
Before Chief Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice R.S. Jha
Decided on February 26, 2015

Relevancy of the Case: Bail application in a VYAPAM scam case

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 65, 66)
  • The MP Recognised Examination Act, 1937 (Section 1, 2, 3D, 4)
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 438)
  • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Section 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471)

Relevant Facts of the Case

  • The applicant is a resident of Uttar Pradesh and studies MBBS at Kanpur University. Despite this fact, he registered himself for the entrance test conducted by VYAPAM.
  • He was allegedly acting as a scorer in the exam.
  • He submitted his wrong address to VYAPAM. Therefore, the police authorities were not able to serve notice. After the detailed investigation, the police found the correct address and served the notice.
  • The applicant seeks anticipatory bail through this petition.

Opinion of the Bench

  • The answers of the petitioner and the candidates seated around him in the exam are similar.
  • There is a prima facie case against the petitioner.
  • Custodial interrogation is necessary to discover more facts and evidence.

Final Decision

  • The court dismissed the application.